I've only read a couple articles, but it was pretty amazing.
- the prose seemed good. I expected some statement about human review, but I didn't find any.
- the citing sources at the end is really interesting
I chose politically charged topics (Chris Christie criticizing Trump; Texas floating border obstacles) to see how it would handle those. It was pretty damn good.
My big question is whether they have actual deals with those sources or if they are scraping without permission? If the latter, it seems like a very shaky model that will get cut off if Neural Times gains too much traction. It's like taking Google-level scraping and turning it 11, maybe 12.
