Author Topic: Ubuntu: "Windows installer is not compatible with Windows 8 or UEFI firmware"  (Read 2170 times)

rcjordan

  • I'm consulting the authorities on the subject
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16309
  • Debbie says...
    • View Profile
Ubuntu users, if/when windows installer works on Win 8, let me know.  Otherwise, it's a PITA on Win8.

ergophobe

  • Inner Core
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9279
    • View Profile
I've only run it with Windows by running it as a VM (rather than dual boot). Is this much better? Because the VM route is dead easy and works fine on Win8.

rcjordan

  • I'm consulting the authorities on the subject
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16309
  • Debbie says...
    • View Profile
I don't know which is better, total noob.  My plan was to boot in ubuntu and just switch to win8 for the apps that require it. MOST days on this machine are browsing only, so win8 isn't really required all that often.

What got my interest about dual boot was a friend with win7 and ubuntu dual boot. He was telling me that the ubuntu could navigate to the windows users files and might possibly be able to salvage them even if windows was totally bricked.  I thought I'd give it a try.

rcjordan

  • I'm consulting the authorities on the subject
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16309
  • Debbie says...
    • View Profile
From a friend w/ dual boot:

Since i mentioned that is was possible i decided to try it. The Dell laptop was getting wonky. I don't use any virus protection and I picked up some malware,  It was starting to slow down.

I never keep anything too important on the laptop but the downloads folder was filled with installers and videos and what not, plus a the most recent family pics.

Anyway, i launched linux, backed up the win user files to the linux side and reinstalled the OS "installation will erase everything on the disk, are you sure you want to do this?" -- YES.

Put on a clean win7, nice and zippy, no malware. and then rebooted to linux to move my files back.

worked great.

ergophobe

  • Inner Core
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9279
    • View Profile
Good to know! So that is one advantage over the VM route - with the VM you have to launch the host OS and then the guest OS. Either one can be host or guest, but if the host is bricked, obviously you ain't lauching the guest.

rcjordan

  • I'm consulting the authorities on the subject
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16309
  • Debbie says...
    • View Profile
>but if the host is bricked

Yeah, over the past 20 years I've had plenty of Win systems go belly-up. All but once early-on, I was confident that I had everything backed up and that data losses were minimal, if any.  Even so, I *STILL* wanted to get in there and look around one last time. You know, like checking the hotel bathroom and under the bed before checkout.  So dual is good for that even if you didn't care for using linux for production.

What I wonder, though, is what keeps the  reloaded Win disk image from overwriting the linux install? Partitioning the disk?

rcjordan

  • I'm consulting the authorities on the subject
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16309
  • Debbie says...
    • View Profile
>what I wonder

Posed the question to my friend. Reply:

I have no idea, I discovered it by accident.  I think it has something to do with the master boot record saying a given space is allocated. Or maybe it looks like a partition  to the MBR but but not when you look at the drive properties?