Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - aaron

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 14
1
Is it grift?

Absolutely it is a grift.

Look at healthcare spending relative to GDP across time for the US and then look at it versus any other country and it is obvious there is more than just a bit of mixed shifting around of costs.

Even the least expensive patients in the private sector get to enjoy things like differential pricing based on insurance status, gotcha dropped coverage for pre-existing conditions (illegal, but they do it anyhow), illegal to import medicines from Canada (out of alleged safety concerns) even though the company which manufactures the pills offshored the production to China or India, double billing, billing for services not rendered, hidden prices until after the fact.

There are also CON laws where you have to get your direct competitors to sign a paper stating your services are needed before you can open a new service provider, then on the flip side there are hospital groups doing regional roll ups, the whole "out of service" insurance exemptions & so on.

Of course older people break down and consume way more healthcare products & services than younger people do, but like just the fraud in the healthcare system is a tithing over the entire economy.

Think of how much hype something like ChatGPT is getting & how much online databases and technology have lowered the cost of organizing data sets over time. Obamacare was being touted as a "jobs" program
https://www.politico.com/agenda/story/2016/07/what-is-the-effect-of-obamacare-economy-000164/
where people were getting McJobs shuffling paperwork back and forth between insurers and care providers.

When Republicans pushed to repeal the ACA the New York Times warned it could detrail that McJobs job engine
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/06/business/health-act-repeal-would-strike-economys-engine.html

And all we really need to do is look at the stock price of United Healthcare (UNH) since Obamacare passed and ask if we should expect government regulated financial intermediaries to grow market cap at a faster rate than the global FANG monopolies have. Their share price was ~ $21 a share when Obama took office & is now ~ $480, for a 23x growth in 14 years. They aren't a small company either, with a market cap of $448 billion - about 25% larger than Meta.

My disgust for the above gift stems in part from having my wife dropped from insurance coverage twice. Once before Obamacare and once during it. If we didn't move after she was illegally dropped by the insurer we would have been fined for being uninsured.

2
Economics & Investing / Re: Market Wraps Up Worst Year Since 2008
« on: January 14, 2023, 02:22:11 PM »
Given climate change worries, I think demand for renewables will be high for the foreseeable future.

Cutoff of Russian gas to EU.
If, we commit to EV's as a replacement for ICE's this will increase demand for electricity.  Make your choice, nuclear or renewables or backslide to fossil fuels (see climate change above.)
Hotter summers will increase use of or adoption of air conditioning.

I can't pinpoint individual stocks.  I'd look for mutual funds focusing on renewables. Specifically Western mfg. because we can't rely on China and all those other supply chain issues that are supposed to be teaching us lessons.
The big winner there is going to be nuclear power as it is far greener than the other green energy sources & is not intermittent. Politicians have been pushing to reclassify nuclear as green.
https://www.reuters.com/business/sustainable-business/eu-parliament-vote-green-gas-nuclear-rules-2022-07-06/

Part of the reason nuclear was originally hated was not only the cold war related fears, but also malthusians who pushed environmentalism as a means of population control:
https://doomberg.substack.com/p/malthusian-malarkey
Quote from: Paul Ehrlich
“In fact, giving society cheap abundant energy at this point would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun.”

The uranium market went through a decade plus long bear market due to combo of ...
- cheap natural gas as a free output of US oil fracking (they were even flaring off a lot of it)
- scares related to Fukushima & Japan knocking their plants offline
- many nuclear weapons being recycled for fuel

A pure-play on the nuclear fuel price is Sprott Physical Uranium Trust / SRUUF, U.U & U.UN
https://sprott.com/investment-strategies/physical-commodity-funds/uranium/
It hasn't really mooned, but if oil prices take off again & natural gas prices also lift this could be a secondary way to play energy as many countries try to curtail inflation by investing in more stable energy supplies.

The 2 biggest Uranium producers (equivalent of OPEC for uranium) are Cameco (CCJ) and Kazatomprom (NATKY) Both of them have some fur on them. Cameco bought Westinghouse, which will water down their returns from mining if uranium prices spike. Kazatomprom is in Kazakhstan, with all the political treats that may entail for a foreign investor.

The US is building out LNG export terminals which will reign in gas prices in Europe, while lifting domestic US natural gas prices. Businesses with outsized margins in part from low US nat gas prices may see significant margin compression as the LGN market makes natural gas a bit more like oil, with tighter regional spreads on pricing.

There isn't a ton of western manufacturing on renewables. China keeps increasing their domestic coal usage (some years building more new coal plants than the rest of the world combined) and using their labor + energy price arbitrage to price dump solar cells into other markets. They also have a big advantage with rare earths production & processing due to environmental arbitrage, though production there can get spun up in other markets as supply chains decouple. China is building a ton of nuclear power plants (150 new plants in 15 years)
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2021-11-02/china-climate-goals-hinge-on-440-billion-nuclear-power-plan-to-rival-u-s
Nuclear power plants typically try to keep 2 or 3 years of fuel in reserves, so that is going to be a lot of incremental buying as China brings those plants online. 

Around when I was born the scare was global cooling. The warming stuff may reverse:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7575229/
Quote
"This discovery of double dynamo action in the Sun brought us a timely warning about the upcoming grand solar minimum 1, when solar magnetic field and its magnetic activity will be reduced by 70%. This period has started in the Sun in 2020 and will last until 2053. During this modern grand minimum, one would expect to see a reduction of the average terrestrial temperature by up to 1.0°C, especially, during the periods of solar minima between the cycles 25–26 and 26–27, e.g. in the decade 2031–2043."

3
Traffic / Re: SEO is Dead, Long Live LLMO
« on: January 14, 2023, 01:57:22 PM »
The thing that smoked SEO was the increasing ad load in SERPs & the repurposed content in the search results (almost always inserted just below the ad layer). Google doesn't mind others normalizing rewriting content because the media outlets that call the technology awesome and the future won't be able to complain too loudly when Google rolls out something similar.

4
Traffic / Re: Flight from Twitter to Mastodon
« on: January 14, 2023, 01:54:38 PM »
"Of more than 140,000 Twitter users who announced they were moving to Mastodon, just 1.6 per cent have actually quit Elon Musk’s social media platform"

Mastodon: Most people who threatened to quit Twitter haven't moved over | New Scientist

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2349641-most-people-who-threatened-to-quit-twitter-for-mastodon-havent-left/
those people overlap the move to Canada people when Agent Orange took the white house. ... they're all talk. :D

5
You Have to Pay a Subscription to Use Pantone Colors in Photoshop Now | PetaPixel

https://petapixel.com/2022/10/28/you-have-to-pay-a-subscription-to-use-pantone-colors-in-photoshop-now/
Trying to make this computer with a legacy lifetime Adobe subscription last as long as I do, though rolling the dice sometimes by putting it in the luggage when I travel. :D

One big thing with subscriptions is the friction upfront is much higher than it is given credit for unless people think they can dip in and out of it easily. It is easier to sell something for say $80 than it is to sell a $7 a month recurring subscription. This also has implications for affiliates.

Some merchants who provided lifetime recurring splits on affiliate driven sales eventually see the affiliate channel slow down as the core brand rise, which in turn has them go through with opening up a second affiliate channel on a different platform as pretext for needing to simplify the affiliate channel by nixing the legacy one so they can scrub out those recurring affiliate payments.

6
VPNs are cheap and ubiquitous.
It can be a new batch of keyword themes by VPN affiliates, much like how streaming Netflix or other services in markets where they did not exist yet in the past were.

7
Big issue is a disproportionate share of senior spending is on healthcare services & absolutely no politicians are doing anything to reign in the grift there.

8
They also made 529 savings accounts so they are able to be converted into IRAs if all the funds are not used on education. I intend to do max contribution every year for my daughter. Of course, they could somehow later do some sort of means testing or changing it back to not allow that.

9
Water Cooler / Re: Longest Shutdown Ever
« on: January 14, 2019, 10:44:59 AM »
The pension liabilities issue was only enhanced by QE, which drove down bond yields & forced pension plans out into riskier investments. Now that they are engaging in QT they are sucking liquidity out of the system, which should generally have the opposite impact on asset prices. Many companies which trade at rather low P/E ratios like AT&T also have massive amounts of debt. AT&T's current debt load is about 80% of their stock's current market cap, so multiply the P/E by 1.8 for a starting point & then of course there are all the various adjustments made to earnings.

https://www.barrons.com/articles/barrons-2019-investment-roundtable-part-1-51547262307
Quote
the Federal Reserve has engaged in quantitative tightening, or shrinking its balance sheet, to the tune of $50 billion per month. We are talking about the creation of an ocean of debt, while the Fed has raised rates nine times in the current cycle, in addition to quantitative tightening, which, according to some studies, equates to about two more rate hikes. The Fed wants to raise rates two more times this year, based on its dot plot [individual rate projections by the members of its policy-setting committee]. This is a problem for the stock market. U.S. manufacturing data has deteriorated. Mortgage applications are near an 18-year low. ... Backing off on quantitative tightening would be a big help to the markets, but it won’t happen with the S&P down less than 20%. Stocks would have to fall 30% from their peak for the U.S. central bank to consider this.
the impact of the central bank money printing has had an even bigger impact on emerging markets because they grew debts faster than developed markets.
Quote
I’m negative on emerging markets and have been for the past decade, during which they significantly underperformed developed markets. Emerging markets benefit most from quantitative easing. As interest rates collapsed, they became prolific borrowers on both a country and corporate basis. Second, liquidity risk in these markets is significant. A lot of money is chasing very few stocks and bidding up allocations, even if EM allocations haven’t gone up. There are very good companies in, say, India, but I own none because they don’t compete from an investment standpoint.
I think China has been responsible for something like 40% of the global credit growth since the Great Recession & about 22% of their housing units sit empty.

10
Traffic / Re: Google Moved $23 Billion To Bermuda Tax Haven In 2017
« on: January 11, 2019, 11:55:30 AM »
Quote
I'd just tax everything at the point of sale
That taxes the poor more than the wealthy though....   not saying I have an answer...
Longterm capital gain rates being far lower than ordinary income tax rates already does this (especially when combined with central banks buying tons of assets to inflate asset prices and drive the wealth effect). What's more, this year sees the roll out of "Opportunity Zones" (pushed by Sean Parker) which will further defer capital gains payment requirements while allowing further compounding without paying anything.

Shifting to a flat consumption tax would shift some of the burden off of domestic labor, which diminishes the returns of offshoring & further improves domestic wages.

At the lower end of the wage spectrum people can be granted a rebate in advance to lower their effective rates.

Warren Buffett regularly complains about paying higher rates than his secretary. The only way that gets fixed is if capital gains are treated as ordinary income or the system shifts to be based on consumption rather than income. Now if it goes all to consumption he might still have access to a lower rate, but at least those leasing jets for personal use can get a higher rate on that consumption, vs say...
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/06/warren-buffett-jet-company-_n_1313351.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_spending_in_the_United_States

52% of the US government discretionary income goes to defense, $678 billion in 2019.  Morality is very subjective, but to me this is a complete perversion of the use of resources. I think people get mad at companies like Google for using loopholes because it leaves more of the burden to the ordinary people to pay up the differences.   
And healthcare costs at least double what it should (or what it would in a market where anti-competitive monopolistic abuse scams were treated as the crimes they are).

11
Economics & Investing / Re: FAANG stocks 2018 performance
« on: January 11, 2019, 11:49:34 AM »
Netflix is probably going to a have a tough time in 2019 as well.

Everyone else is investing heavily in video, driving up their costs.

If the economy cools their market cap would pull back as valuations fall across the board.

If the economy gets hot they'd have to pay higher rates while larding on more debt.

What happens to Neflix's market cap the first quarter they have negative growth while still remaining unprofitable?

And they have a bunch of competition coming this year. Disney will push Hulu harder & launch Disney+, AT&T has to show massive growth for WarnerMedia to justify the acquisition price, etc. … and at the lower end Amazon's IMDB, Google's YouTube & Facebook are all paying to buy rights to movies & classic sitcoms to offer ad supported video content. Then Apple is likely to roll out an Amazon Prime-like service that includes movies with music & other media formats

12
Water Cooler / Re: One year in San Francisco as a Software Engineer
« on: January 11, 2019, 06:21:33 AM »
Quote
lots of great cheap food.
If you are willing to walk this is still true. :)

Huge portion sizes, low prices & great meatz @ spots like http://www.taquerialoscoyotes.com

13
India is pushing widespread usage of Aadhar Cards to residents.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aadhaar
It was launched in January 2009, but has been picking up speed in the past couple years.

About a week ago the WSJ published an article titled India’s Biometric Feat: Big Boon or Big Brother?
Quote
Nandan Nilekani, the billionaire founder of Indian IT services giant Infosys Ltd. and the program’s original chairman, calls Aadhaar the modern equivalent of the U.S. instituting Social Security numbers in 1936. He likens the government funding to U.S. federal investments in the interstate highway system and in research projects that led to GPS and the internet.

Critics also say Aadhaar has been subject to monumental mission creep. It has morphed, they say, from a voluntary program distributing benefits to the poor to one that is effectively required for many facets of daily life. Some schools, for example, have required children to have Aadhaar IDs in order to enroll. Many local governments and businesses now demand Aadhaar numbers for obtaining marriage certificates, purchasing train tickets and even for gaining entrance to cricket matches, in addition to getting bank accounts and phones.
A story WSJ published in January stated
Quote
Earlier this year, the Unique Identification Authority of India, the government body that runs the Aadhaar program, lodged a police complaint against a journalist for a story about how she accessed cardholders’ personal data by paying an anonymous seller on WhatsApp 500 rupees ($7.80).

14
Grid would be an open declaration of war requiring a swift & brutal response.

Almost nobody would want that unless they were making someone else look like the source.

15
A lot of states have/had laws like that for car sales.
If you are not the middleman it is easy to see that as a flaw. But if you are the middleman it is a vital layer of protection from destitution.

Some of those laws came into being due to abuses in the supply chain during the great depression.
Quote
During the Depression, desperate manufacturers often forced dealers to take new vehicles they hadn't ordered. Automakers recruited too many new dealers, including some who sold cars from their houses, storefronts or gravel lots. Such tactics thrust too many dealers into fierce competition with each other.

Established dealers with investments in their dealerships, property, experienced employees and stock turned to discounting vehicle prices and overpaying on trade-ins to make new-vehicle sales. But they were up against brokers and low-investment storefront franchise holders who showed little regard for sales territories.

Competition deteriorated into often unsustainable actions: selling on price alone, fierce price wars, rampant overpaying for used cars, clocking odometers, hiding defects, or otherwise tricking sales customers and overcharging service customers.

Borrowing Prohibition slang, some dealers engaged in bootlegging -- shedding excess new cars by selling them for a few dollars under factory invoice to a broker in another dealer's territory.
NADA almost went under
Quote
In May, NADA’s general manager told the board that, based on the renewal record and members’ difficulty in paying dues, it would be “impossibleto carry the association beyond the first six months of the year without drastic changes.”

The secretary was to find new quarters for the association at a cost not to exceed $50 per month. The board reduced activity to a minimum and for the rest of 1932 employed only a secretary-manager and a stenographer, who also handled bookkeeping. The general counsel, field staff and mailroomclerk were let go.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 14