Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Water Cooler / Re: tuning out?
« Last post by ergophobe on Today at 02:09:17 AM »
I rarely unsubscribe as I figure it confirms that the email address is legit and active.

I think that's mostly an issue with actual spammers, of which there are few. Anyone using a modern email system will unsubscribe you.

And as I want to remain active in political races that I can actually vote in, I don't want to just block them all. I also want to get the updates from my representatives with the exception of the one who pisses me off every time I read or hear anything he says.

My goal is not to tune out of politics entirely, but it's to tune out politicians I cannot vote for or against (and presidential politics).
2
Water Cooler / Re: tuning out?
« Last post by rcjordan on Today at 01:26:51 AM »
>unsubscribe

I rarely unsubscribe as I figure it confirms that the email address is legit and active.  I mark them as spam ...even some newsletters from chatty acquaintances.

>politicians

I don't even send them to spam, I set up filters to delete upon arrival.
3
Water Cooler / Re: tuning out?
« Last post by ergophobe on Today at 12:23:29 AM »
Tim Ferriss always talks about making the one decision that avoids a hundred downstream decisions.

Having made a handful of political donations and having given my email address to various politicians when contacting them on issues, it seems that they share it like crazy. So years ago I made a decision to never donate to anyone who calls on the phone, since that's the most disruptive. That makes it easy to field calls.

But I still get email pitches from all sorts of politicians who do not represent me, most of whom I have never heard of. I have a new simple rule - any email that comes from someone for whom I am not a potential constituent, immediately gets unsubscribed. No figuring out whether or not I support their cause or oppose it.

And as a secondary thing, if it is not a one-click unsubscribe (like they make me fill in my email address in order to unsubscribe), then it gets marked as spam, even if I wholeheartedly support their agenda.

I've finally gotten to the point where I get few such messages and most of those go straight to the spam folder.
5
Water Cooler / Re: Quotes that hit home
« Last post by ergophobe on September 28, 2023, 11:15:16 PM »
"I am very intelligent and very devoted to my work in the camps. I struck at least two prisoners every day.”

— Wanda Klaff at her trial for crimes against humanity committed at the Stutthoff concentration camp, for which she was executed in 1946 at the age of 24.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wanda_Klaff
6
Water Cooler / Re: New, Good Media
« Last post by littleman on September 28, 2023, 09:05:57 PM »
The Foundation (Apple TV), very good SciFi based on Isaac Asimov's work.

>Cunk On Earth

Very funny stuff to me.
8
Water Cooler / Re: Quotes that hit home
« Last post by rcjordan on September 26, 2023, 05:40:51 PM »
>222 years

...need more potatoes;

"the introduction of potatoes helped reduce conflict in Europe for a minimum for 200 years." • Earth.com

https://www.earth.com/news/potatoes-keep-peace-europe/
9
Water Cooler / Re: Quotes that hit home
« Last post by ergophobe on September 26, 2023, 02:55:30 PM »
It’s also interesting considering

Quote
This morning, I discovered an interesting statistic, “America Has Been At War 93% of the Time – 222 Out of 239 Years – Since 1776“,  i.e. the U.S. has only been at peace for less than 20 years total since its birth

BTW, it’s not that much different for France.

https://freakonometrics.hypotheses.org/50473
10
Water Cooler / Re: Quotes that hit home
« Last post by littleman on September 25, 2023, 06:36:50 PM »
That's an interesting one considering who said it and when it was said.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10