The Core

Why We Are Here => Water Cooler => Topic started by: grnidone on October 17, 2012, 04:42:56 PM

Title: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: grnidone on October 17, 2012, 04:42:56 PM
*shrug* Brett keeps the moneymaker Pubcon though...Wonder if my nick will be unlocked so I can post there?

http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/blog/marketing/webmasterworld
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: Rupert on October 17, 2012, 05:16:10 PM
Blimey, I had not realised he was after so much real estate.

  Heather, I am sure you could get you Nick back.. if you really wanted it  ::)
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: BoL on October 17, 2012, 05:22:15 PM
Looking forward to a design overhaul....
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: Zwart on October 17, 2012, 05:39:29 PM
Ah this is the 'big thing' that was announced on Cre8, after his taking over SEOChat and Cre8 (including Kim K-B hehe).

SC has still not had its own (promised) major overhaul tho, so those of you frequenting WMW shouldn't hold your breath either - methinks.
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: Brad on October 17, 2012, 08:45:16 PM
Been a long time since I've been to WMW.  I never thought Brett would part with it.
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: agerhart on October 18, 2012, 12:22:11 AM
how much $$$??
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: bill on October 18, 2012, 02:54:22 AM
Interesting. I don't know much more than what's been publicly announced. It sounds like they want to keep the place pretty much the same though.
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: IrishWonder on October 18, 2012, 02:24:43 PM
What next - buying all half secret forums?  ;D
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: Brad on October 18, 2012, 02:45:34 PM
I'm wondering what Boykin will do with all those forums.  Is the benefit to him branding and exposure?
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: eljefe3 on October 18, 2012, 02:49:11 PM
Wonder what the mods cut will be  ;D.?  Quite a few years ago there were supposed to be shares and payouts made.  I still haven't seen a penny, but did get a few lunches out of pubcon.  

There seems to be a lot of money in conferences as there seems to be more of them sprouting up that I keep getting pitched to attend via various fb groups and online forums.  Maybe I should start a beachcon.com webmaster conference for those that want to come to tropical island and talk shop before heading out for a fine evening.
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: dbcooper on October 18, 2012, 03:10:33 PM
>Maybe I should start a beachcon.com webmaster conference for those that want to come to tropical island and talk shop before heading out for a fine evening.

That works. Trust me on this.
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: grnidone on October 18, 2012, 03:47:12 PM
>I still haven't seen a penny,

And you never will. Hell, if Brett could charge you to be a moderator there he would.
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: grnidone on October 18, 2012, 04:09:39 PM
>a beachcon.com webmaster conference

I love that idea!  Which island?
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: littleman on October 18, 2012, 07:48:28 PM
>Wonder what the mods cut will be?

Ouch!  Considering that about half his original staff is here...

Off the top I have to say that the conferences will be a lot less of a draw without WMW for their sounding board.
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: eljefe3 on October 19, 2012, 01:19:20 AM
>Ouch

Hehe, yeah I know so that's why I threw it out there as there will be none of the promised.

Beachcon.com-- taken by a contractor called beach contractors.
Beachcon.org--Some sort of gamer site.
Beachcon.net-- Available.

I remember a few years back there was a webmasters in the sun conference which was for progressive marketers in the affiliate space and every year it was held at different venues and ended up in a lot of deals being put together.
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: dbcooper on October 19, 2012, 01:33:49 AM
It helps those who are going to write it off as a business expense if the name sounds professional.
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: ergophobe on October 19, 2012, 05:03:40 AM
Quote
Off the top I have to say that the conferences will be a lot less of a draw without WMW for their sounding board.

You think so? I just finished up with Pubcon and so many of the people here either have no clue what WMW is or they remember it from years ago, but haven't posted there in years. It's not like years ago where you put your WMW nick on your name tag and everyone there knew who you were.... for good or ill.
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: bill on October 19, 2012, 05:21:46 AM
Wonder what the mods cut will be  ;D.?
Don't complain or we'll make you Mod the Google forum during an algo change!
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: grnidone on October 19, 2012, 02:15:53 PM
>I just finished up with Pubcon and so many of the people here either have no clue what WMW is or they remember it from years ago, but haven't posted there in years.

I think that is it exactly:  WmW is more of a PITA for Tabke than something that helps the cause.  Now that Pubcon is his breadwinner, he can devote all resources to taking care of that. 
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: littleman on October 19, 2012, 06:14:40 PM
>You think so?

I guess that's just me thinking it was 10 years ago.  I haven't paid any attention to pubcon in a long time.  Still, doesn't the event need a sounding board?
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: rcjordan on October 19, 2012, 07:03:56 PM
>doesn't the event need a sounding board?

That's my thinking. It certainly did back when.  I'm assuming that BT and Boykin have worked out some sort of cross-promotional deal in advance but even if they have I'm guessing that a lot of the other places that now promote pubcon vegas do so with an eye to the size of the forum membership.  Separating them makes the continuation of that free 3rd-party promotion dicey after a year or two. This year will be fine but it'll eventually dawn on everyone that there was a split.

>mods/pay

That was the original plan, yes.

>write it off as a business expense if the name sounds professional.

This was a problem from the gitgo --one that just got bigger as the event grew. But keep in mind that we were 99.9% independent BH spammers in the early days and didn't need approval by corporate expense managers.  BARconference in Irvine had even more negative impact from the name.

Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: Rumbas on October 20, 2012, 07:50:46 AM
Interesting.

Beachcon, count me in. We've done a fair share of smaller and larger private cons around the world.
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: Chunkford on October 20, 2012, 09:23:24 AM
Beachcon - would there be a th3core VIP area?
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: TallTroll on October 20, 2012, 09:27:59 AM
As far as I know, WITS still runs. It's Keith Hazeldens gig, I think
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: Rumbas on October 20, 2012, 10:57:02 AM
>Beachcon - would there be a th3core VIP area?

It's ONLY a Core VIP gig. ;-)
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: I, Brian on October 20, 2012, 05:26:28 PM
Hm, seems a strange time to be adding forums - thought these were generally suffering post Panda/Penguin?

And three forums with such a potential overlap? Sounds like overkill and a headache running them as separate entities and more so if he ever considers merging them.
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: rcjordan on October 20, 2012, 05:32:36 PM
>suffering

I know I never see WmW in the serps anymore and I've been doing some deep searching the last few weeks on mobile web design and scripts. 18 months ago and prior on similar searches -particularly for the scripts- WmW would invariably be on the first page somewhere.

That said, I think Boykins is just setting up a network to harvest potential clients and the old forums will still probably do that.
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: Brad on October 20, 2012, 07:22:37 PM
I have no idea what Boykin's current setup is like but maybe he feels he needs a community to counter seomoz.
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: BoL on October 21, 2012, 02:53:20 AM
It's probably a good move for the site itself as Brett was never around much the past few years. It'll be interesting to see what direction it goes, as it's not like the members of the past will go flocking back... and the competition from seomoz, and places like stack overflow is pretty fierce.
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: IrishWonder on October 21, 2012, 08:07:55 AM
Would Jim be around much, really?

And surely nobody here believes in him just implementing a childhood dream of owning all the old forums? :)
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: Zwart on October 21, 2012, 09:25:50 AM
I wonder if he's made a bid on syndk8 yet  ;D 8) :P
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: rcjordan on October 21, 2012, 12:05:54 PM
>stackoverflow

Good point. I see that one in the top 5 serps all the time now.
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: ukgimp on October 21, 2012, 05:24:48 PM
WITS was mooted for a return. The last one I remember was Spain a few years ago.
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: agerhart on October 22, 2012, 07:27:19 PM
So did anyone hear about a sales price yet?
Title: Re: Jim Boykin Purchases WebMasterWorld (WMW)
Post by: IrishWonder on October 26, 2012, 01:44:28 AM
I wonder if he's made a bid on syndk8 yet  ;D 8) :P
That would have been a bit too cheeky of him :)