The Core

Why We Are Here => Hardware & Technology => Topic started by: rcjordan on June 15, 2011, 03:48:13 PM

Title: US cable content bundlers to become dumb pipes
Post by: rcjordan on June 15, 2011, 03:48:13 PM
Alternate Title:

Existing Cable Revenue Model Puts Its Head Between Its Legs And Kisses Its Ass Goodbye

In March 2011, TDG queried a random sample of adult broadband users that subscribe to cable, satellite, or telcoTV service as to the likelihood they would downgrade their PayTV service in the next six months—that is, "...move from a higher service tier to a lower one, or cancel a premium service of some kind." In general, the percentage of Netflix Streamers to varying degrees likely to downgrade their PayTV service increased from 16% in 2010 to 32% in 2011.

http://tdgresearch.com/blogs/press-releases/archive/2011/06/09/tdg-proclivity-to-downgrade-paytv-services-increasing-among-netflix-streamers.aspx


"Some 15-20 percent of Roku owners are cancelling their cable or satellite services agreement and are relying solely on a broadband connection to get their television programming"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andy-plesser/roku-owners-are-cutting-t_b_860280.html

Title: Re: US cable content bundlers to become dumb pipes
Post by: grnidone on June 16, 2011, 02:30:19 PM
Cable operators deserve it.  They've been ripping people off for far too long.
Title: Re: US cable content bundlers to become dumb pipes
Post by: Brad on June 16, 2011, 08:58:38 PM
With a digital antenna, Channel Master over the air DVR, Roku, AppleTV and the Internets I really don't need cable channels.  People are getting used to their programming ala carte and the cable TV industry needs to adapt.
Title: Re: US cable content bundlers to become dumb pipes
Post by: rcjordan on June 16, 2011, 09:20:45 PM
"Wall Street analysts warned cable operators on Tuesday that they'd better fix their clunky user interfaces and lousy consumer service if they want to avoid a showdown with Internet and technology powers such as Google and Apple. The big threat 'isn't really Netflix. It's something we haven't seen yet,' Citigroup Investment Research's Jason Bazinet said in a panel discussion about the industry's financial prospects at the National Cable Show in Chicago."

http://www.deadline.com/print-post/?posttoprint=139909&KeepThis=true&TB_iframe=true&height=500&width=750
Title: Re: US cable content bundlers to become dumb pipes
Post by: grnidone on June 17, 2011, 04:03:51 PM
Exactly.  That is exactly what it is.  Crappy service, and high charges.  People have are sick to death of being f*cked up the back end.

Being told the cable guy will come to your house between 1 and 6 and then they don't show up, or they charge out the nose to have a second television in the house EVEN though it is the same line.  Or being charged twice for cable AND internet.

Screw em.  I hope they go out of business.  I've got nothin nice to say about them.  *shakes fist*
Title: Re: US cable content bundlers to become dumb pipes
Post by: Travoli on June 20, 2011, 01:22:02 AM
Cox just raised our cable bill.  It is now $190/month.  I like to DVR a few shows, but they aren't worth several dollars each.  I might cancel cable altogether.  They've gone mad.
Title: Re: US cable content bundlers to become dumb pipes
Post by: Rumbas on June 20, 2011, 10:59:02 AM
>It is now $190/month

Holy moly!
Title: Re: US cable content bundlers to become dumb pipes
Post by: Drastic on June 20, 2011, 06:16:36 PM
Yep, when my stuff went over $100/month I dropped it. Back then they only had 7 or 8 HD channels which is all I watched.

Add the fact you are paying for channels that run ads almost as bad as the big 4, and I have no desire to go back. I don't understand why consumer prices aren't much less, must be a LOT of hands in the pie.
Title: Re: US cable content bundlers to become dumb pipes
Post by: Travoli on June 20, 2011, 08:38:17 PM
>Holy moly!

It isn't a big deal, Rasmus.  Dollars are barely real money anymore. 
Title: Re: US cable content bundlers to become dumb pipes
Post by: Rumbas on June 20, 2011, 09:01:13 PM
Good point Trav, however $200 is pricey imo. Though with internet access, ip tv, ip phone I'm probably there to.. sigh.