What! no JS attachments in Gmail

[Chunkford]

Is this an early Aprils fools joke?

[JasonD]

very sensible IMO considering gmail itself going to be serving (although is it from the google domain?) it so it could potentially bypass the SOP

[rcjordan]

No joke. It's been in the tech news a couple of times over the last month or so.

[littleman]

Just rename the extension to .txt.

[Chunkford]

I suppose it's not too bad, just need to change my habits and use drive instead 😁

[Drastic]

Anything that could be errantly (or not) executed in the client should be zipped up, imo.

[Chunkford]

It was zipped up. Google went in and scanned the contents and said "Tut, tut, naughty, naughty"