Author Topic: Government digital currencies will transform finance  (Read 2244 times)

Rupert

  • Inner Core
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3394
  • George in a previous life.
    • View Profile
Government digital currencies will transform finance
« on: May 06, 2021, 06:42:14 PM »
https://www.economist.com/leaders/2021/05/08/the-digital-currencies-that-matter


Both our cover and special report this week look at a technological shift that promises to upend finance. Government digital currencies, or “govcoins”, are a new incarnation of money. They promise to make finance work better but also to shift power from individuals to the state, alter geopolitics and change how capital is allocated. Instead of holding an account with a retail bank, you would hold one directly with a central bank, through an interface resembling apps such as Alipay or Venmo. Rather than writing cheques or paying online with a card, you could use the central bank’s cheap plumbing. And your money would be guaranteed by the full faith of the state, not a fallible bank. Over 50 monetary authorities, in America, the EU, Britain and elsewhere, are exploring digital currencies. China is experimenting and the Bahamas has already issued its own. Governments and financial firms need to prepare for a shift in how money works that is as momentous as the leap to metallic coins or payment cards—a shift that promises a vast spectrum of opportunities, but also real dangers
... Make sure you live before you die.

ergophobe

  • Inner Core
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9743
    • View Profile
Re: Government digital currencies will transform finance
« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2021, 11:29:10 PM »
If you're a podcast listener, try to find an interview with Balaji Srinivasam. He was CTO of Coinbase and previously was founder of some startup that he sold to Coinbase. Interesting perspectives. He's an evangelist, but an interesting one. He recently did a mega interview with Tim Ferriss (over three hours, but nevertheless dense) and a more digestible but less interesting interview on What Bitcoin Did.

Anyway, he is really trying to get India to go big on crypto. His stance is that India, Russia and Iran can and should throw in with Bitcoin, rather than their own coin. But the interesting part of his argument is that right now most of the economy uses the dollar as a money of account (oil first and foremost, but other goods too). This opens countries like Russia and Iran to sanctions, but it makes other countries beholden to the US. China is trying to get the world to switch to the yuan and could succeed.

But it's clear that the world is not switching to the rupee, the ruble or the rial. So while China can break away from US currency domination and maybe even Europe could try, nobody else is even close. So tripling down on crypto would be the path forward.

Rupert

  • Inner Core
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3394
  • George in a previous life.
    • View Profile
Re: Government digital currencies will transform finance
« Reply #2 on: May 08, 2021, 06:19:12 AM »
Quote
Balaji Srinivasam.
checking it out.  3 hours is a bit more than my attention span could manage I suspect :)
... Make sure you live before you die.

ergophobe

  • Inner Core
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9743
    • View Profile
Re: Government digital currencies will transform finance
« Reply #3 on: May 09, 2021, 06:36:16 PM »
It took me a week to listen to the whole thing off and on. Still, I would say that despite the length, the density of ideas is high. In fact, I briefly considered just starting it over again. I think some of his stuff is off base, but even those observations are thought-provoking.

My wife was more skeptical than me, but had the same reaction - surprised to make it all the way through, but then feeling like it might be worth a second listen.

I guess it depends on how much you know about the topics. For us, on the subject of crypto, the answer was, "close to nothing." So if you're better-informed, it will no doubt be less thought-provoking.

The one-hour version on "What Bitcoin Did" is more focused, but less interesting. But for the specific topic that started the thread, has the kernel of it.
« Last Edit: May 09, 2021, 06:40:08 PM by ergophobe »