Author Topic: The human internet is dying. AI images taking over google... : r/ChatGPT  (Read 898 times)

rcjordan

  • I'm consulting the authorities on the subject
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16839
  • Debbie says...
    • View Profile

littleman

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6654
    • View Profile
Re: The human internet is dying. AI images taking over google... : r/ChatGPT
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2024, 12:24:26 AM »
Yep, it is really lowering the quality of image search.  I am hoping that something like "-ai" becomes a standard to filter out the computer generated images.

ergophobe

  • Inner Core
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9630
    • View Profile
Re: The human internet is dying. AI images taking over google... : r/ChatGPT
« Reply #2 on: October 09, 2024, 12:41:16 AM »
Agreed. Usually they are easy to spot for humans, but more and more so I have to click through before it’s obvious. In another year, we won’t be able to tell.

We talk about jobs that AI will eliminate, but I rarely see people mention models, but I just don’t see paying people $5,000 for a photoshoot very often 5-10 years from now.

Travoli

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1261
    • View Profile
Re: The human internet is dying. AI images taking over google... : r/ChatGPT
« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2024, 08:40:10 PM »
So many AI social media images. It's impossible to "hide" all of the AI spam pages.

Also, lots of seniors can't seem to tell the difference. Engaging, liking, commenting.

AI posts are working.

BoL

  • Inner Core
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1216
    • View Profile
Re: The human internet is dying. AI images taking over google... : r/ChatGPT
« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2024, 01:35:11 PM »
Really noticeable and noticed by lots of non-tech people.

wiki has been going well for a long time. I know it's a relatively unpopular opinion but I think they were part of the initial problem of centralisation. Any non-commercial content basically ended up on there under the guise of referenced content and G loved to rank it above most things. That and it's generally convenient to visit a site where you have a gist of their layout to save yourself time as a searcher.

There must have been a lot of original sources that were maybe the bulk of an article that are now ranked #2 or lower where wiki is #1, halving their CTR.

And then AI/anyone can just grab the wiki dump and proceed to recycle content.