« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Panda Hitting UK  (Read 8171 times)

eurotrash

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
    • View Profile
Re: Panda Hitting UK
« Reply #15 on: April 18, 2011, 08:08:01 AM »
Larry Fitzgibbon's latest statement (didn't they issue a press release saying they were not going to say anything else?) on Demand Media's woes(?) which is about 5 words less than his "Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements"

http://www.demandmedia.com/blog/another-statement-about-search-engine-algorithm-changes/

Logged

ukgimp

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2241
    • View Profile
Re: Panda Hitting UK
« Reply #16 on: April 18, 2011, 09:02:16 AM »
That bottom bit is mentally long. Corporate a## covering
Logged

eurotrash

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
    • View Profile
Re: Panda Hitting UK
« Reply #17 on: April 21, 2011, 07:03:57 AM »
This is interesting from WSJ after 2 months of Panda in the US

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703806304576236983790385202.html
Logged

Gurtie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1628
    • View Profile
Re: Panda Hitting UK
« Reply #18 on: April 21, 2011, 07:26:31 AM »
o/t - what an awesome optimised url that is.
Logged

Rooftop

  • Inner Core
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1915
    • View Profile
Re: Panda Hitting UK
« Reply #19 on: April 21, 2011, 08:33:33 AM »
Quote from: Gurtie on April 21, 2011, 07:26:31 AM
o/t - what an awesome optimised url that is.

Can you believe it that isn't the top result for SB10001424052748703806304576236983790385202 either?  Must hurt - being 1 place off the top spot for a killer kw like that.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »