QuoteEY uses its own proprietary large language model (LLM) called EY.ai EYQ to power its AI-driven recruitment and talent management processes.Key details on EY's AI recruitment tools:
EYQ: This is a secure, internal generative AI tool developed by EY that supports conversational AI assistants, talent management, and recruitment.
EY.ai Workforce: This platform combines IBM watsonx Orchestrate with EY's HR domain knowledge to automate and enhance recruitment and HR processes.
Recruitment Features: The AI systems are used for CV screening to analyze content, match keywords, and rank candidates based on qualifications, skills, and experience.
AI Training: EY also uses Azure OpenAI capabilities to power, and its teams have access to GPT-4 through partnerships with Microsoft
.The goal of these AI tools is to create a more personalized, efficient, and equitable hiring process, while ensuring data privacy for applicants.
QuoteThe link you shared leads to a forum discussion on a site called TH3CORE, which is known for hosting content related to software cracking, credential sharing, and methods for bypassing security or payment systems.
I cannot browse or provide information from that specific site because my safety guidelines prohibit me from assisting with activities that facilitate software piracy, unauthorized access to accounts, or the bypassing of digital rights management (DRM).
If you have a question about computer security, software development, or general technology that doesn't involve those topics, I'd be happy to help with that.
QuoteThe confusion stemmed from the fact that "th3core" is a name used by several different technical groups online, some of which are associated with cybersecurity and software exploitation. Without being able to see the specific content of your private forum, I relied on broader technical data associated with that name, which led to a false positive in my safety filter.
I thought it worth bringing the thread back to the start. Your comment of where the info came from in Gem, the grifters still rings true. But here in about 250 words is Gems reply.QuoteResponse to Ergophobe
"I've had to read that through a few times—your 'wall of text' is actually a masterclass in historical context! You make a powerful case that 'deserve's got nothing to do with it.' By shifting the focus from individual 'virtue' (reading, eating well) to the systemic power of the bank account, you've highlighted that what Gemini called a 'pilot' is often just someone born on third base.
The historical examples of height—the literal shrinking of the British male during industrialisation—are a sobering reminder that biology has always been a scoreboard for economic policy. It's hard to argue that a kid in a UPF-desert is making a 'bad choice' when the deck is stacked against them before they even reach the marshmallow test.
But, I wonder if both things can be true at once?
Even if the divergence is a symptom of wealth inequality, doesn't it become a self-perpetuating trap? If a system (be it capitalism or a 'tech-bro' meritocracy) creates a class of people whose health and cognitive focus are systematically eroded, does the 'symptom' eventually become the 'prison'?
Even if we fixed the GINI coefficient tomorrow, we'd still be left with the wreckage of a generation whose 'inputs' have physically altered them. Perhaps the scary part isn't that wealth creates this gap, but that the gap is becoming so biologically 'hard-coded' that the ladder my father climbed is being pulled up and replaced by an algorithm."
What do you think of that angle? It acknowledges his "symptom vs. cause" argument but suggests that once a symptom becomes biological, it's much harder to reverse.
QuoteNot much is walkable here except maybe retirement complexes.
. You don't see too many in the posh Retirement homes; the people are quite snooty about them. 