Terminator Scenario

Started by Travoli, November 02, 2010, 02:36:32 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Chunkford

"If my answers frighten you then you should cease asking scary questions"

littleman

Right, it is one step closer to cyborg zombies -- not quite alive, not really dead.

littleman

Human Rights Watch: Ban 'Killer Robots' Before It's Too Late
http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/11/19/ban-killer-robots-it-s-too-late

QuoteFully autonomous weapons do not yet exist, and major powers, including the United States, have not made a decision to deploy them. But high-tech militaries are developing or have already deployed precursors that illustrate the push toward greater autonomy for machines on the battlefield. The United States is a leader in this technological development. Several other countries – including China, Germany, Israel, South Korea, Russia, and the United Kingdom – have also been involved. Many experts predict that full autonomy for weapons could be achieved in 20 to 30 years, and some think even sooner.

Drastic

My guess would be more like 2-5 years. I'd be willing to bet they already have beta tech for autonomous predator-style drones.

littleman

Yeah, I think you are right, 20 to 30 year seems way too far off.  I mean, Google is already having robots drive their cars down the streets here in California.

rcjordan

Cambridge to open 'Terminator centre' to study threat to humans from artificial intelligence.

Centre will examine the possibility that there might be a 'Pandora's box' moment with technology
The founders say technologies already have the 'potential to threaten our own existence'


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2238152/Cambridge-University-open-Terminator-centre-study-threat-humans-artificial-intelligence.html

edo

Cheers for that link. Glad to see a top university is looking into stuff like this. It annoys me that 99.9% of the population dismiss it all as sci-fi gobbledegook when in fact it's just short-sightedness on their behalf. I don't agree with Martin's Rees's prediction that we'll wipe ourselves out by 2100, but it has to be a live contender by 2200 when you think of the potential dangers of AI, grey goo (nanotech), super viruses, nuclear weaponry and so on will hold by then. At the moment all of our eggs are in one basket on Earth. Which is why I hope Elon Musk does get to Mars by 2020  ;D

rcjordan

Well, we're screwed now. Human burger-flippers will be displaced;

a new robot that can make about 360 burgers an hour in a 24-square foot area

http://momentummachines.com/gallery/

ROI is estimated by the company to be around 100%.

Drastic

Wow, chops the veggies and everything. Good looking burger, too.

Pimple faced kids are going to be out of work.

rcjordan


littleman

Often I wonder what people are going to do for a living in the near future.  I think there is going to have to be some radical political/social rethinking as humans aren't needed to do basic tasks.

rcjordan

You know, I was thinking the other day that there were two long-running 'prediction' threads in the old core. One was the pre-bubble 'housing-prices-are-going-to-drop-25%' and the other was the 'Terminator Scenario.'  If the TS thread is as on-target as the bubble thread was, we're pretty much screwed.

>humans aren't needed

On many levels, the best solution -and biggest challenge- lies in population control.

<added>
>population control

Wait! Terminator Scenario. Problem solved!

littleman


rcjordan

3 words: The Pentagon Papers

IrishWonder

Quote from: rcjordan on November 26, 2012, 11:16:52 PM
You know, I was thinking the other day that there were two long-running 'prediction' threads in the old core. One was the pre-bubble 'housing-prices-are-going-to-drop-25%' and the other was the 'Terminator Scenario.'  If the TS thread is as on-target as the bubble thread was, we're pretty much screwed.

>humans aren't needed

On many levels, the best solution -and biggest challenge- lies in population control.

<added>
>population control

Wait! Terminator Scenario. Problem solved!
As a long term people hater, I am not sure I am exactly opposed to it